First Liberty Institute commissioned the following polls from Mason Dixon Polling & Strategy – a nationwide poll and two statewide polls in West Virginia and Arizona – revealing more than two-thirds (2/3’s) of Americans oppose adding seats to the Supreme Court of the United States.
The nationwide poll suggests that 68% of all respondents oppose court-packing. Importantly, self-identified Independent voters overwhelmingly reject plans to pack the court (68% opposed).
You can download the results of the statewide polls for West Virginia here and for Arizona here.
HOW THE POLL WAS CONDUCTED
This poll was conducted by Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy, Inc. of Jacksonville, Florida from April 15 through April 19, 2021. A total of 1,100 registered voters were interviewed nationwide by telephone.
Those interviewed were randomly selected from a nationwide voter registration list that included both land-lines and mobile phones. Quotas were assigned in order to reflect voter registration by state.
The margin for error, according to standards customarily used by statisticians, is no more than ±3 percentage points. This means that there is a 95 percent probability that the “true” figure would fall within that range if all voters were surveyed. The margin for error is higher for any subgroup, such as a gender or age grouping.
QUESTION: THE ISSUE OF “PACKING THE COURT” HAS BEEN PART OF THE POLITICAL DEBATE IN RECENT YEARS. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE ISSUE OF “COURT-PACKING”?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
YES
79%
84%
75%
87%
71%
78%
72%
85%
NO
21%
16%
25%
13%
29%
22%
28%
15%
QUESTION: FOR OVER 150 YEARS, THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS HAD NINE JUSTICES. “COURT-PACKING” IS GENERALLY DEFINED AS INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SUPREME COURT SEATS, PRIMARILY TO ALTER THE IDEOLOGICAL BALANCE OF THE COURT. DO YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE “COURT-PACKING”?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
27%
19%
35%
50%
4%
26%
35%
20%
OPPOSE
68%
79%
58%
47%
90%
68%
59%
75%
UNDECIDED
5%
2%
7%
3%
6%
6%
6%
5%
QUESTION: DO YOU FEEL PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BACK A PLAN PROPOSED BYCONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FROM NINE MEMBERS TO THIRTEEN MEMBERS?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
31%
25%
36%
63%
3%
22%
40%
23%
SHOULD NOT
65%
73%
58%
33%
95%
72%
55%
74%
NOT SURE
4%
2%
6%
4%
2%
6%
5%
3%
QUESTION: IF DONALD TRUMP HAD BEEN REELECTED AS PRESIDENT AND HE PROPOSED INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE SUPREME COURT FROM NINE MEMBERS TO THIRTEEN MEMBERS, WOULD YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE HIS EFFORTS?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
11%
17%
6%
7%
14%
13%
14%
8%
OPPOSE
83%
81%
84%
90%
76%
83%
81%
84%
UNDECIDED
6%
2%
10%
3%
10%
4%
5%
8%
QUESTION: IF A PLAN TO PACK THE U.S. SUPREME COURT WITH MORE JUSTICES SUCCEEDS, DO YOU BELIEVE PROTECTIONS FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY WOULD INCREASE OR DECREASE?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
INCREASE
20%
16%
23%
33%
9%
17%
24%
17%
DECREASE
44%
49%
39%
20%
66%
50%
39%
49%
NO CHANGE
20%
21%
20%
24%
16%
19%
22%
18%
NOT SURE
16%
14%
18%
23%
9%
14%
15%
16%
QUESTION: If a plan to pack the U.S. Supreme Court with more Justices succeeds, do you believe the Court would become more independent or less independent?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
MORE
40%
35%
44%
63%
14%
41%
42%
38%
LESS
47%
55%
39%
18%
78%
49%
40%
53%
NO CHANGE
10%
7%
13%
17%
5%
5%
13%
8%
NOT SURE
3%
3%
4%
2%
3%
5%
5%
1%
QUESTION: The calls to pack the U.S. Supreme Court with more Justices have almost exclusively come from Democrats. Do you believe “court-packing” is primarily a partisan proposal intended to increase political power, or not?”
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
YES
63%
71%
56%
37%
93%
60%
58%
67%
NO
29%
25%
32%
53%
3%
31%
35%
24%
NOT SURE
8%
4%
12%
10%
4%
9%
7%
9%
QUESTION: Do you believe the U.S. Supreme Court is currently overworked, or not?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
YES
18%
16%
20%
26%
10%
19%
20%
16%
NO
69%
73%
65%
61%
79%
67%
62%
75%
NOT SURE
13%
11%
15%
13%
11%
14%
18%
9%
QUESTION: Do you support or oppose ending the filibuster in the United States Senate?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
39%
36%
41%
73%
9%
31%
48%
30%
OPPOSE
52%
57%
48%
17%
83%
61%
39%
64%
UNDECIDED
9%
7%
11%
10%
8%
8%
13%
6%
QUESTION: The filibuster requires that 60 Senators must vote for a bill before it can come to the floor of the Senate for a final vote. It is designed as a check on the power of the U.S. House of Representatives, which can move legislation through very quickly with simple majority votes. The filibuster is designed to slow the process so that there is more debate and that final approval of a law has some level of bi-partisan support. Based on this information, do you support or oppose ending the filibuster in the Senate?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
37%
30%
43%
70%
7%
28%
46%
29%
OPPOSE
54%
64%
45%
15%
87%
69%
43%
64%
UNDECIDED
9%
6%
12%
15%
6%
3%
11%
7%
QUESTION: If your U.S. Senator voted to remove the filibuster rule and pack the Supreme Court, would you be more likely to vote to re-elect him or her or less likely to vote to re-elect him or her?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
MORE LIKELY
31%
23%
38%
57%
6%
25%
38%
24%
LESS LIKELY
54%
65%
44%
27%
81%
56%
45%
62%
NO EFFECT
15%
12%
18%
16%
13%
19%
17%
14%
QUESTION: President Biden recently formed the “Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States.” The purpose of the Commission is, “to provide an analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals.” Do you support or oppose the formation of the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
SUPPORT
43%
41%
45%
84%
13%
23%
53%
35%
OPPOSE
51%
56%
46%
10%
84%
66%
41%
59%
UNDECIDED
6%
3%
9%
6%
3%
11%
6%
6%
QUESTION: President Biden’s U.S. Supreme Court Commission will be filled with scholars, former judges, and lawyers who have previously argued before the Court. When it comes to making its recommendations, do you feel such a group will equally consider the interests and values of average citizens or will it be more influenced by the interests and values of the political establishment?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
CITIZENS
35%
31%
38%
63%
12%
27%
38%
32%
ESTABLISHMENT
52%
58%
47%
20%
79%
62%
46%
57%
NOT SURE
13%
11%
15%
17%
9%
11%
16%
11%
QUESTION: By a margin of nearly 2 to 1, the members of the President’s commission are more liberal than conservative. Do you feel President Biden’s U.S. Supreme Court Commission is more likely to conduct an objective review of court reform proposals or more likely to rubber stamp proposals being advanced by partisan political groups?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
OBJECTIVE
39%
35%
43%
77%
7%
29%
42%
36%
RUBBER STAMP
52%
60%
45%
16%
87%
55%
47%
57%
NOT SURE
9%
5%
12%
7%
6%
16%
11%
7%
QUESTION: In 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt attempted to pack the court. Though President Roosevelt was not successful in adding Justices to the Supreme Court, experts agree that his court-packing efforts resulted in more favorable decisions by the Justices on President Roosevelt’s legislative agenda. Do you believe President Biden is using the threat of court packing is an attempt to influence the current Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court to protect his legislative agenda, or not?
NATIONWIDE
MALE
FEMALE
DEMS
REPS
INDS
<50
50+
YES
57%
67%
48%
37%
74%
64%
53%
61%
NO
37%
27%
46%
56%
19%
33%
39%
35%
NOT SURE
6%
6%
6%
7%
7%
3%
8%
4%
DEMOGRAPHICS
PARTY
Democrat
420 (38%)
Republican
381 (35%)
Independent/Other
299 (27%)
AGE
18-34
203 (18%)
35-49
294 (27%)
50-64
307 (28%)
65+
272 (25%)
Refused
24 (2%)
RACE/ETHNICITY:
White/Caucasian
737 (67%)
Black/African American
143 (13%)
Hispanic/Latino
154 (14%)
Other/Refused
66 (6%)
GENDER ID:
Male
519 (47%)
Female
575 (52%)
Other
6 (1%)
REGION:
Northeast
220 (20%)
Midwest
210 (19%)
South
350 (32%)
West
130 (12%)
Pacific Coast
190 (17%)
x
Special Scholar's Report
Download your copy today!
In this comprehensive research report, Patrick M. Garry, an American law professor and author reveals the facts, history and the destructive consequences of the current court-packing scheme. If left unchecked, this Supreme Court Coup will have dangerous consequences. The truth is, if this coup attempt is successful—it will almost certainly mean the end of religious freedom in America. You don't want to be caught unprepared for what is coming. Get your copy today.